Bryan Brandenburg

Washington DC and the Nuremberg Trial 2009

In dissent, Justice William Brennan argued that the need to preserve military discipline should not protect the government from liability and punishment for serious violations of constitutional rights:

“The medical trials at Nuremberg in 1947 deeply impressed upon the world that experimentation with unknowing human subjects is morally and legally unacceptable. The United States Military Tribunal established the Nuremberg Code as a standard against which to judge German scientists who experimented with human subjects… . [I]n defiance of this principle, military intelligence officials … began surreptitiously testing chemical and biological materials, including LSD.”

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, writing a separate dissent, stated:

“No judicially crafted rule should insulate from liability the involuntary and unknowing human experimentation alleged to have occurred in this case. Indeed, as Justice Brennan observes, the United States played an instrumental role in the criminal prosecution of Nazi officials who experimented with human subjects during the Second World War, and the standards that the Nuremberg Military Tribunals developed to judge the behavior of the defendants stated that the ‘voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential … to satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.’ If this principle is violated, the very least that society can do is to see that the victims are compensated, as best they can be, by the perpetrators.”

The ten points of the Nuremberg Code

The ten points are, (all from United States National Institutes of Health) [1]

1.       The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

2.       The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

3.       The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

4.       The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a  knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

5.       The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

6.       No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

7.       The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

8.       Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

9.       The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

10.   During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

11.   During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

The Principles

Principle I

Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment.

Principle II

The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.

Principle III

The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.

Principle IV

The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.

Principle V

Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.

Principle VI

The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:

(a) Crimes against peace:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

(b) War Crimes:

Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

(c) Crimes against humanity:

Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.

Principle VII

Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.

“The Quest”, Experimental Virtual Soldier Technology, Testing Unknown Chemicals and Biological Weapons on Humans – And How It Relates to Military Tribunals

The Science of God-Part I

Most religions agree that God is the Light, but they often fail to realize that the Sun produces over 99% of the light for our Solar System.  They also often lack the understanding of Quantum Physics to conclude that Photons of light are carriers of intelligence, just like a radio transmitter frequency modulates (FM) music onto a carrier wave known as a channel.

The Quarks of sub-atomic particles bound together with gluons comprise a sophisticated transmitter and receiver of intelligence that goes beyond the scope of point charges. While it is true that collisions of sub-atomic particles predictably result in pre-determined outcomes that can be expressed as Feynman Diagrams, the variable is the intelligence encoded on these very high frequency carriers. This is the Intelligence of God.

Every atom in the universe emits photons that contain intelligence. But based on atomic half-lives, exposure to other sub-atomic particles and a variety of chemical and biochemical circumstances, each atom varies in its production of light. Even humans emit light, in fact, almost 50% of the calories consumed every day, result in the production of photons and other forms of radiation.  We literally transmit intelligence spatially to everything around us.

Light exhibits unique properties dictated by Einstein’s proven Theory of Relativity. The results of the Lorentz Transforms conclude that light has Energy and Mass that approach infinity, relative to objects around it and that its volume and time approach zero.  When examining these particles of intelligence under the scrutiny of Relativity and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, it becomes more clear the dynamic and intelligent nature of these “point particles”, that are in reality, sophisticated worlds that man can barely conceive, less alone observe or measure.

Cosmic Background Radiation is “God’s Will”, if you may. CBR is the blueprint of this universe, which is merely a grain of sand in the sea of universes. You could view CBR as a grand orchestra containing instruments that are orchestras containing instruments that are orchestras, and so on.  Free will is just  the organism, such as humans, or galaxies or microbes playing their “instrument” that is their physical vessel. Everyone has observed the same instrument, playing music that delights and music that sounds like fingernails on a chalkboard. Furthermore, an instrument that alone plays beautiful music but is out of sync with the rest of the orchestra, stresses the orchestra, and has an impact on the rest of the orchestra, disproportionate to its relative importance as a single instrument and is frequently referred to as the Butterfly Effect in Chaos Theory.

Last but not least, all forces of nature, electromagnetism, the strong interaction, the weak interaction and gravity can be expressed as electromagnetic energy as defined by Supersymmetry. Read more about this and its relationship to the Creator in my next article.